Skip to main content
File #: 26-0063    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Information Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 12/30/2025 In control: Environmental and Water Resources Committee
On agenda: 1/26/2026 Final action:
Title: Receive an Update on the Desalination Engineering Feasibility Study.
Attachments: 1. Attachment 1: PowerPoint

COMMITTEE AGENDA MEMORANDUM

Environmental and Water Resources Committee


Government Code § 84308 Applies:  Yes 
  No 
(If “YES” Complete Attachment A - Gov. Code § 84308)

 



SUBJECT:
title

Receive an Update on the Desalination Engineering Feasibility Study.

End

 

RECOMMENDATIONRecommendation

Receive an Update on the Desalination Engineering Feasibility Study.

Body

 

SUMMARY:

This memorandum provides an update on the Desalination Engineering Feasibility Study. Since the last update to the Environmental and Water Resources Committee (EWRC) on April 2, 2025, Valley Water has completed the Fatal Flaw Analysis, initiated the alternatives analysis, conducted additional regulatory and environmental partner coordination, and begun refining feasible alternatives for further evaluation.

 

BACKGROUND

Valley Water continues to assess desalination as a potential future water supply source and in 2023, completed the Desalination Environmental Feasibility and Planning Study (DEFPS), which identified intake options, facility locations, and brine management strategies. These elements form the foundation for the ongoing engineering-level evaluations.

 

ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY

The Engineering Feasibility Study has two components, the Fatal Flaw Analysis and Alternatives Analysis:

 

1.                     Fatal Flaw Analysis: The Fatal Flaw Analysis screened potential desalination alternatives identified in the DEFPS, along with options newly proposed by Valley Water. Alternatives that were unlikely to receive environmental or regulatory approval, were technically infeasible, or did not meet the 10-40 million gallons per day (MGD) production target were removed from further consideration.

 

2.                     Alternatives Analysis: The Alternatives Analysis evaluated those options passing through the Fatal Flaw Analysis and further refined them to determine engineering feasibility. These include the following components:

 

 

 

 

Intake Locations

Intake alternatives are based on applicable guidance from the California Water Code, San Francisco Basin Plan, and relevant sections of the California Ocean Plan (COP). Intake locations under evaluation include:

                     Deep South San Francisco Bay

                     Mouth of Coyote Creek

                     Northern portion of Guadalupe Slough

 

Potential intake structures include on-bank/near-shore intakes and offshore submerged intakes using passive screen technologies.

 

Facility Siting

Potential facility locations were evaluated based on physical benefits and regulatory, technical, geotechnical, and land-use considerations. The three remaining siting options are:

                     Sunnyvale Baylands

                     Palo Alto (former Los Altos Treatment Plant site)

                     San Jose near the Silicon Valley Advanced Water Purification Facility

 

Brine Management

Potential brine discharge alternatives include:

                     Commingling with effluent from the San Jose wastewater treatment facility

                     Use of a deep-water South Bay outfall

 

REGULATORY COORDINATION AND OUTREACH

Given the significant permitting requirements for intake structures, facility siting, and brine management, Valley Water has continued to coordinate closely with regulatory agencies and environmental partners. Since the last update, staff has met with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board), the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), and environmental organizations to inform them of the Study progress.

 

At a meeting on October 3, 2025, regulators agreed with Valley Water’s conclusion that the California Ocean Plan does not apply to the South Bay. State Board staff will review our technical findings and potentially issue a concurrence letter. This determination, combined with hydrogeologic conditions showing disconnected aquifers and widespread impermeable Bay mud, supports the continued evaluation of surface intake options over subsurface intakes.

 

Valley Water also engaged with the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), Mid-Peninsula Open Space District, and the Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge (CCCR). Staff additionally presented updates to the Recycled Water Committee to maintain stakeholder awareness and input.

 

NEXT STEPS

 

Staff will continue engagement with regulatory agencies and environmental partners while completing the detailed alternatives analysis. Additional updates will be provided at the 50% and 100% milestones of the Alternatives Analysis Report. A final update on the Desalination Engineering Feasibility Study will be presented to the Board of Directors upon Study completion in spring 2026.

 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IMPACT:

There is no environmental justice impact associated with this item. This action is unlikely to or will not result in adverse impacts.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1:  PowerPoint

 

 

UNCLASSIFIED MANAGER:

Manager

Kirsten Struve, 408-630-3138




Notice to Public:

The Santa Clara Valley Water District publishes meeting agendas two Fridays prior to regular meetings, and publishes amended and special meeting agendas one Friday prior. During the process of amending an agenda, individual links to Board Agenda Reports may not be available. In these cases, please reference the “Full Agenda Package” instead.