Skip to main content
File #: 26-0164    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Information Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/22/2026 In control: Board Audit Committee
On agenda: 2/18/2026 Final action:
Title: Continue Discussion on the Status of the On-call Management Services Agreement for the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) and Recommend the Board of Directors Initiate a Request for Proposal (RFP).
Attachments: 1. Attachment 1: Role of Auditing in Public Sector Governance, 2. Attachment 2: Guide to Selecting a Chief Audit Executive, 3. Attachment 3: Audit Committee Guidance, 4. Attachment 4: ALGA Recommends In-House Audit Capacity

COMMITTEE AGENDA MEMORANDUM

Board Audit Committee


Government Code § 84308 Applies:  Yes 
  No 
(If “YES” Complete Attachment A - Gov. Code § 84308)

 



SUBJECT:
title

Continue Discussion on the Status of the On-call Management Services Agreement for the Chief Audit Executive (CAE) and Recommend the Board of Directors Initiate a Request for Proposal (RFP).

End

 

RECOMMENDATIONRecommendation

A.                     Continue discussion on the status of the On-call Management Services Agreement for the CAE, and

B.                     Recommend the Board of Directors initiate an RFP.

Body

 

SUMMARY:

At the January 21st, 2026, BAC meeting staff introduced this topic for consideration.  After some discussion, the committee decided to continue this topic at the next committee meeting, and asked staff to investigate other opportunities to include best auditing practices in the scope of services of the next request for proposal.

Summary of Staff Research

Accordingly, staff has attached four guidance publications related to local government auditing best practices as references for the continued discussion as follows:

                     Attachment 1 is titled “The role of auditing in public sector governance” by the Institute of Internal Auditors

                     Attachment 2 is titled “Guide to selecting a Chief Audit Executive” by the Association of Local Government Auditors

                     Attachment 3 is titled “Audit Committee Guidance” by the Association of Local Government Auditors

                     Attachment 4 is titled “ALGA Recommends Independent In-House Audit Capacity” by the Association of Local Government Auditors

Further staff research has found that to be credible and effective, public sector audit activities must have:

                     Organizational independence

                     A formal legal mandate

                     Unrestricted access to people, records, and systems

                     Sufficient and protected funding

                     Competent, professionally qualified leadership

                     Objective and skilled staff

                     Stakeholder support

                     Adherence to professional audit standards (e.g., IIA standards)

Without these elements, audit functions cannot fully protect the public interest.  

Recommendation to Initiate an RFP

The current CAE agreement with Sjoberg Evashenk Consulting, Inc. (A4570A/CAS5183) is set to expire on November 22, 2026 after the completion of the five-year agreement including the initial three-year term and two one-year time extensions. To ensure continuity of audit operations and allow sufficient time for the incoming CAE to complete the tri-annual risk assessment and develop the recommended 2027 audit plan by November 30, 2026 as required by the Audit Charter, staff recommends that the BAC proceed with the proposed timeline for the RFP process to select a new CAE:

1)                     February 18, 2026 (BAC Meeting):

a)                     Request BAC recommendation to the full Board to initiate an RFP for a new CAE agreement.

2)                     February 24, 2026 (Board Meeting):

a)                     Seek Board approval to initiate the RFP.

b)                     If approved, staff will work with Procurement to issue the RFP.

3)                     August 25, 2026 (Board Meeting)

a)                     Request Board approval of the new CAE agreement

i)                     If Sjoberg is re-selected, the risk assessment can begin in August.

ii)                     If a new firm is selected, Sjoberg will complete activities through November 22, 2026

iii)                     If a new firm is selected, the new CAE firm can initiate the Risk Assessment in August.

 

In the past, the Board Audit Committee (BAC) has expressed a desire to be involved in the evaluation process to select the CAE. During the last CAE procurement process, the BAC selected one of its members to join two staff members on the Evaluation Committee to ensure the BAC’s interests and desires informed the selection process. In this way, the evaluation process was conducted in a manner that maintained the integrity of the procurement process and was unaffected by the Brown Act. The BAC is requested to provide direction on whether or not to assign a committee member to the Evaluation Committee for this procurement (assuming full Board approval). If a BAC member is not assigned to the Evaluation Committee, then the Evaluation Committee would be comprised of staff only.

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IMPACT:

There are no environmental justice impacts associated with this item.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: Role of Auditing in Public Sector Governance

Attachment 2: Guide to Selecting a Chief Audit Executive

Attachment 3: Audit Committee Guidance

Attachment 4: ALGA Recommends In-House Audit Capacity

 

 

UNCLASSIFIED MANAGER:

Manager

Darin Taylor, 408-630-3068




Notice to Public:

The Santa Clara Valley Water District publishes meeting agendas two Fridays prior to regular meetings, and publishes amended and special meeting agendas one Friday prior. During the process of amending an agenda, individual links to Board Agenda Reports may not be available. In these cases, please reference the “Full Agenda Package” instead.